FreightTender vs email tendering
Email works until you need defensible comparison, faster awards, and an exportable record — then structure matters.
Email tendering: typical gaps
- Brokers may see or infer competing bids → spreads narrow
- Thin award evidence for finance and audit
- Multi-day cycles; timing risk for laycan and demurrage
- Heavy manual consolidation across formats
Closed-bid / structured tenders
- Each broker sees only their invitation
- Timestamped invite, bid, and award rationale
- Same-day or next-day awards on many desks
- One comparison table — rate plus laycan, vessel, demurrage
Total cost
Hidden cost in email: admin time, demurrage from slow fixture, and weak spread on tight panels. Model your desk in the ROI calculator or read closed-bid tendering.
Find leakage in your brokered freight RFQs
Compare five email awards vs five sealed tenders on your routes — no commitment.